Cases

Home > Cases > Dongguan Qiaosen Machinery Co., Ltd. Latest company case about Vibration‑Noise Integrated Renovation Case of Hardware Stamping Enterprise for Export Auto‑Parts

EVENTS

news

Cases

titi@qiaosenmachinery.com

86-0769-26626853

Contact Now

Vibration‑Noise Integrated Renovation Case of Hardware Stamping Enterprise for Export Auto‑Parts

2026-08-08

Case Cycle: September 2025‑August 2026

Enterprise Background: A Jiangsu export‑oriented stamping enterprise mainly produces automobile chassis hardware stamping parts, equipped with multiple 160‑315 ton mechanical punch presses. Before renovation, stamping workshop noise was persistently above 93 dB(A); ground vibration disturbed adjacent precision measuring room, resulting in frequent measuring instrument drift. Overseas customers put forward rectification requirements during factory audit, otherwise export cooperation would be suspended. Meanwhile, high mold consumption and frequent bolt loosening increased maintenance workload. The enterprise launched integrated transformation project combining vibration isolation, damping and noise‑reduction enclosure.

Case Before‑After Transformation Core Data Comparison

Monitoring & Operational Indicators	Before Vibration‑Noise Renovation	After Integrated Renovation Completion	Actual Obtained Benefit
Workshop Equivalent Continuous Noise	94 dB(A)	76 dB(A)	‑18 dB(A)
Ground Vibration Acceleration Value	0.94 m/s²	0.18 m/s²	‑80.9% Vibration Reduction
Monthly Equipment Loosening‑related Breakdown	14 times	2 times	‑85.7% Failure Frequency
Average Mold Service Life	87 000 strokes	133 000 strokes	+52.9% Mold Life Extension
Measuring Instrument Zero‑drift Incidents Monthly	21 times	2 times	‑90.5% Inspection Abnormality
Overseas Customer Factory Audit Result	Conditional pass with rectification notice	Full pass	Stable qualification for export orders

Core Implementation Measures for Vibration‑Noise Renovation

Field test of stamping impact frequency, ground rigidity and resonance risk point for each punch press; select high‑damping spring vibration isolators matched with equipment tonnage, replace rigid foundation connection, cut vibration transmission path to ground;
Install modular noise‑reduction enclosure built with sound‑absorbing cotton and perforated plate for key high‑noise units, reserve quick‑opening access for mold replacement and equipment maintenance, optimize internal air‑duct layout to guarantee heat dissipation of servo and motor;
Optimize stamping process parameters, adopt servo soft‑contact stamping curve to reduce instantaneous impact force at mold closure under the premise of satisfying forming quality;
Readjust workshop functional zoning, physically separate stamping production zone from precision measurement laboratory, further reduce vibration interference to inspection equipment;
Establish regular inspection SOP for vibration isolators and enclosure components, check damping aging and bolt fastening status monthly, maintain long‑term stability of renovation effect.

Case Professional Q&A Analysis

Q1: Why cannot simply adding sound‑proof enclosure completely solve vibration‑derived equipment failures?

A1: Noise enclosure only blocks outward sound radiation, yet impact vibration still transmits to foundation and machine‑tool itself. If vibration isolation is not processed at source, bolt loosening, guide‑rail wear and mold eccentric wear will still occur. Only combining vibration‑isolation at transmission path and noise shielding can realize synchronous improvement of equipment reliability and workshop environment.

Q2: What is the return‑on‑investment logic of such renovation for export‑oriented stamping factories?

A2: Direct economic benefits come from reduced mold consumption and reduced equipment maintenance cost. More important invisible benefit is removing EHS audit barrier for overseas high‑value orders. Many export stamping enterprises face order loss risk due to unqualified workshop environment. Qualified EHS environment becomes basic threshold for entering supply chain of international auto‑part clients.

Q3: What mistakes should medium‑small stamping enterprises avoid when carrying out vibration‑noise improvement?

A3: Avoid purchasing general‑purpose damping accessories without on‑site testing. Blind selection of isolator with mismatched stiffness may trigger resonance and aggravate vibration. Do not sacrifice equipment maintainability for noise reduction; mold‑changing space, heat dissipation and daily inspection access must be fully considered in scheme design. Priority can be given to core key units for phased transformation to control one‑time investment pressure.

Case Conclusion & Outlook

This renovation practice proves that punch‑press vibration‑noise control is not merely environmental‑protection investment, but important measure for protecting equipment, extending mold life and supporting overseas market expansion. After transformation, the enterprise not only meets occupational‑health and customer audit standards, but also obviously cuts mold and maintenance cost. In future planning, the enterprise will introduce real‑time vibration monitoring sensors for key punch presses, realize early warning of abnormal vibration, and further build an intelligent, green export‑oriented stamping workshop.

Send your inquiry directly to us